Amazfit Watch faces

please port this for gtr 4

Spoiler

https://www.facer.io/watchface/OSCusj8o ... atch4black

Screenshot 2024-05-20 211834.png (95.32 KiB) Viewed 1403 times

Hasnain732 wrote: 20 May 2024, 16:16

please port this for gtr 4

Spoiler

https://www.facer.io/watchface/OSCusj8o ... atch4black
Screenshot 2024-05-20 211834.png

Understand before downloading
This watch face I made will not accept any further edit requests.
This dial has some elements that are different from the original.
This watch face was not test on real device .
Therefore, users please manage the risk yourself.

If anyone wants to make additional changes to be compatible with your existing device, please do so yourself.

PS.
If the requester has not yet asked for permission from the owner of the work to adapt it. If the owner requests deletion, I will delete it immediately.

Download

GTR4:

OMG_212_GTR_4.zip

(593.9 KiB) Downloaded 109 times

Amazfit Balance:
https://amazfitwatchfaces.com/balance/view/964

I try to convert it for GTR3 Pro with no success while there is no compass. Only altimeter. Can convert it for GTR3 Pro with no altimeter of course. Thank you.

amazfitfacesafrica wrote: 21 May 2024, 05:20

I try to convert it for GTR3 Pro with no success while there is no compass. Only altimeter. Can convert it for GTR3 Pro with no altimeter of course. Thank you.

???? There is no compass on this dial, only wind direction.

And in the Barometer section in ZeppOS 1, if I remember correctly, ZeppOS 1 cannot display Altitude on the dial. But it can be displayed as pressure data.
If you want to display Barometer data on ZeppOS1, you can change it to display as pressure.

Example: This watch face has been edited to show Barometer as Pressure instead of Altitude.

Thank you, asoo. Yes i say while there is no compass in this watchface cannot convert properly. I say that because when a watchface contains compass sasha editor 10.4 can't convert it properly. And yes zepp os 1.0 can't show altimeter in a watchface, only barometer can show in a watchface.

thanks alot for this hard work..

brother can you give me the link of watchface editor beta v11 link?

Hasnain732 wrote: 21 May 2024, 12:17

thanks alot for this hard work..

brother can you give me the link of watchface editor beta v11 link?

The beta version is not yet available for download to the public.
Because it is still in the testing phase and adding capabilities.
When completed, SashaCX75 ( program owner) will open it up for download to the public by himself through the relevant forum.

asoo wrote: 21 May 2024, 12:48

Hasnain732 wrote: 21 May 2024, 12:17

thanks alot for this hard work..

brother can you give me the link of watchface editor beta v11 link?

The beta version is not yet available for download to the public.
Because it is still in the testing phase and adding capabilities.
When completed, SashaCX75 ( program owner) will open it up for download to the public by himself through the relevant forum.

can you please make the AOD battery-friendly? by making of this in 2 varients, 01 is turning off the smooth second to normal seconds
and a 2nd version with seconds off.
thanks

can you please make the AOD battery-friendly? by making of this in 2 varients, 01 is turning off the smooth second to normal seconds
and a 2nd version with seconds off.
thanks

Hasnain732 wrote: 21 May 2024, 13:19

can you please make the AOD battery-friendly? by making of this in 2 varients, 01 is turning off the smooth second to normal seconds
and a 2nd version with seconds off.
thanks

I'm actually not going to make any further edits to the dial I've already completed. As informed previously But due to the power reasons you mentioned. I will do it for you.
But after this operation, I request no further corrections.

Turning off "analog smooth seconds" and replacing it with "analog seconds" does not save power.Both elements consume almost the same amount of energy.
If you want to save energy "Analog smooth seconds" and "Analog seconds" must be disabled entirely if you choose to have either of them on. It consumes almost the same amount of energy.
Turning off digital seconds can help save energy. I agree with this.

Download

But actually the original dial and the dial as you want, the energy consumption is not much different. It may reduce energy consumption by 3%-10% per 1 charge, depending on the usage characteristics of each person.

OMG_212_GTR_4_AOD_Normal_Analog_seconds_NO_Digital_second.zip

(594.14 KiB) Downloaded 95 times

OMG_212_GTR_4_AOD_NO_Normal_Analog_seconds_NO_Digital_second.zip

(594.1 KiB) Downloaded 112 times

OMG_212_GTR_4_AOD_Have_Normal_Analog_seconds_Have_Digital_second.zip

(594.16 KiB) Downloaded 72 times